Okay. So ntcc wants the Hampton Homeless story to go away; because everyone knows you don't love God if you don't love people. Folks may not know the scripture 1 Jo 4:19-21 that explains this truth; but they have enough "walkin' around sense" to know that a true "pastor" would NEVER allow ANYONE to go homeless when it is well within his or her means to help. For example, the ntcc, which is a multi-million dollar corporation, has more than enough assets to care for 2 adults and 4 kids laboring for ntcc only 15 miles from the ntcc's empty campground which has hundreds of empty beds. And even if ntcc as a multi-million dollar corporation does not care enough about its own pastors to help Rev. Hampton and his four kids and wife, well, davis, the then-time ntcc president, who is very likely paid ten percent of the corporate assets could well afford to help this family that is working for him and his corporation. Instead davis let the Hampton's remain homeless.
The Hampton's, family of six, four kids and two adults, were left homeless by the hireling rodger w davis while Hampton worked to build a New Testament Christian Church for NTCC in Mexico, Missouri, a town only 15 miles from the NTCC National Campground that has literally hundreds of empty beds. Here is a Bing Aerial View Image of the 80+ acre NTCC National Campground:
And if the corporation NTC was unwilling to dip into its multi-million dollar coffers to help this family laboring for them, davis could have helped by allowing the Hamptons to stay in his huge ski-lodge style vacation home on the ntcc campground, a building named (appropriately) "The Lodge".
"The Lodge" owned by r w and verna and tanya m (michael c kekel) davis / ntcc/g
This is a picture of The Lodge. Notice how huge it is compared to Pop Gaylord (blue shirt) and the other folks standing around in front of it. Upstairs there are six bedrooms with queen size beds and two full bathrooms in the "common area" used for guests. On the end (right side of the photo) upstairs is a private master suite with its own parlor (sitting room), bedroom with king size bed, and full bath. There is also a large balcony for this master suite that runs the width of the building, (accessed from sliding glass doors) and wraps around the front of the building. The three guest bedrooms on the front side of the Lodge each have their own balconies with sliding glass door access (two appear in the photo) Downstairs is a huge fireplace in the center of the building, two separate living room areas (his and her style furniture), a huge conference table, a large area used to showcase some of davis' collectibles, and a huge open central area. There is also a half-bath, laundry room, and large kitchen. Why share all this? To show how easily davis could have helped the Hamptons, but instead davis chose to leave this family homelss while they worked building another ntcc church!
"The Lodge" was owned by rodger w and verna and tanya m (kekel) davis until r w davis unloaded the tax burden on ntc, while boasting of retaining full decision-making power as to who does or does not get to stay there -- ensuring a minimum amount of guests in order to get the tax write-off on the property.
Now an anonymous commenter on Jeff's blog wants to try to discredit this true story, demanding a retraction (make it go away). Hmmn. Let's look at anonymous' comment as posted on Jeff's thread aptly titled "Not About Souls":
Ange consider this a rebuttal to your oft repeated and wholly inaccurate Hampton Homeless Story. When Richard Hampton moved to Mexico Mo. he had just sold a property in Graham, and had enough liquidity to purchase a home for cash at auction in Mexico Mo. which he did. The time the Hamptons spent living with the Dicksons enabled them to remodel the home purchased for cash without having to live in the construction dust. This has been confirmed with Anthony Hampton, and yes I also hang out with Phil, David, and even Chrissy several times a year as well as their children. I post anonymously because among the Rakers of Muck you are the nastiest. We'll see if you have the integrity to retract this inaccurate story you have told numerous times on numerous blogs. It just ain't true. You should probably stick to relating your experiences because those are your own, and refrain from invoking the experiences of innocents who have not asked you to name them publicly in these forums. April 01, 2011 8:43 PMAnd here it is again with our response woven into it:
Anonymous said,
Ange consider this a rebuttal (note the word BUTT) to your oft repeated (as it should be) and wholly inaccurate (Wrong, anonymous. The story is spot-on accurate, as even someone as blind as you shall see.) Hampton Homeless Story (which should be the focus; but anonymous has another agenda other than the Hamptons being left homeless by a hireling [davis] who poses as their pastor). When Richard Hampton moved to Mexico Mo. he had just sold a property in Graham, (True. Any ntcc member has to sell all he has and move lock-stock-and- barrel at the whim of the commanding general, r w davis; because ntcc won't provide any funds to help someone; and you better do the general's bidding, or get run-off for being "rebellious" or "proud" or "just didn't want God" or for "loving a house more than God" [which really describes davis and kekel more than anyone else we can think of] or any other ntcc catch phrase designed to slander someone without anyone verifying the other side of the story. In fact, this selling of Hampton's home and property may be the real reason davis ordered Hampton to Mexico, MO; since the ntc tried to grab Hampton's property at a low-ball, lower - than - market - rate price; trying to squeeze a brother and rob him! [And this is backed up by eli gesang's jacking-up Hampton when he refused ntc's selfish low-ball offer made to him while Hampton was trying to give all he has to help build the borg... hmmnn)
[Hampton] had enough liquidity (big word, anon. Most people / members in ntc don't have enough money to even think in terms of 'liquidity'; because everything they have goes into the ntc, making davis and his family (the kekekls) richer off the sacrifice of the people doing the work.)
... to purchase a home for cash (Really? How do you know it was "for cash"?)
at auction in Mexico Mo. Uhn-hunh... And tell us, anonymous of the liquidity vocabulary, aren't houses sold at auction MUCH cheaper than most houses? So not much cash was involved. And also buying at auction usually requires only a ten-percent down payment in cash while the remainder is often financed. So often only ten percent is actual cash.
So Hampton probably didn't have much cash to throw around, did he? No. How do we know?
at auction in Mexico Mo. Uhn-hunh... And tell us, anonymous of the liquidity vocabulary, aren't houses sold at auction MUCH cheaper than most houses? So not much cash was involved. And also buying at auction usually requires only a ten-percent down payment in cash while the remainder is often financed. So often only ten percent is actual cash.
So Hampton probably didn't have much cash to throw around, did he? No. How do we know?
BECAUSE HAMPTON AND HIS WIFE AND FOUR KIDS WERE HOMELESS!
OBVIOUSLY NO CASH WAS AVAILABLE!
Meanwhile davis the hireling is all fat and cozy in one of his many houses and the campground sits empty only 15 miles away.
OBVIOUSLY NO CASH WAS AVAILABLE!
Meanwhile davis the hireling is all fat and cozy in one of his many houses and the campground sits empty only 15 miles away.
which he did Good for Hampton! Anyone who labors for umpteen years for God in the ntc deserves to own their own house, especially a guy with four kids who just sold his house and property to go build a work for the borg. And any woman like Diana who has spent decades housing and feeding G.I.s in servicemen's works, moving her sons with her all over the world, sacrificing all they have to help others, that woman ESPECIALLY deserves to have her own house / home where she can take care of her family!
And isn't this interesting:
- How does anonymous know how much 'liquidity' (cash) Hampton had?
- What business is THAT of the borg or anonymous to know how much cash someone has?
- What business is THAT how the Hampton's purchased anything???
It should be nobody else's business how much cash or anything else you have!!!! The only time they need to be CONCERNED is if you don't have something that they do have. Then they should help; as it is commanded in the bible.)
The time the Hamptons spent living with the Dicksons (This "living with the Dicksons" is a euphemism-something said to make something bad look better than it is.
The fact is that the Hamptons stayed and slept in Dicksons' GARAGE. We don't consider that "living with the Dicksons" - to be reduced to staying in an old, decrepit, run-down garage like oily rags, while your so-called pastor lives in luxury and leaves you homeless 15 miles away from an empty campground that he has full control over! Thank God the Dickson's helped in the only way they could. It was more than davis did for the Hampton family!
The time the hamptons spent living with the Dicksons enabled (Freudian slip for enabling further abuse)
them to remodel the home (another euphemism for fixin' up an old house to make it habitable)
purchased for cash (notice anonymous' fixation on CASH). Once again, obviously Hamptons' were strapped at this point or they would not have been homeless!
and yes I also hang out with (sounds like another euphemism for being in the same fellowhship hall with them and 200 of your other 'close friends'- ahem-)
Phil, David, and even Chrissy several times a year as well as their children (Thanks for leaving out the name of the children, who are minors, unlike the Hampton's now adult kids whose names appear in my posts to show credibility).
I post anonymously because among the Rakers of Muck (another Freudian slip, since mUck is one of many nick-names given to m c kekel who hates to be called mike. Well, mUck, you certainly are getting raked over the hot coals on these blogs; aren't you? But we suppose that is only REAPING considering how much you and your father-in-law davis blast people from the pulpit, plowing their fields for your private benefit / perverse pleasure.)
you [Ange] are the nastiest. (Ah! Thank you, anonymous. This statement reveals the true nature of why you have posted this reBUTTal: You think I am the "nastiest" of "all the Rakers of Muck". You want to show me something?
Well, anonymous, you have shown me that I have successfully eXposed some of the ntc's nastiest and dirtiest mUck, such as the true stories that may be found in the comments section for the story found at this link,
- r w davis guilty of adultery
- ashmores's son's adultery covered-up by the borg,
- davis runs-off mike marshall, and this true story of
- davis leaves the Hampton's Homeless despite all their sacrifice and suffering.
Which brings us to our next point:
davis never should have ordered the Hamptons to to go do this work. They should have had time to heal. Rich had just lost his wife Penny to the adulterous affair she had with ashmore's son jerry duran, and Diana (marshall) Hampton had just lost her husband mike to davis' infamously and deliberately cruel remark, "If you walk out that door, I'm not coming after you!) Plus her sons Kerry and Carl were grievously hurt by all this, as were Hampton's four children that you have named here.
The point is that these families needed time to heal from these severe blows. As Mom Gaylord told Diana, "There's only so much one person can take." A real pastor and shepherd would care for his flock and give them time to heal. But davis the hireling breaks out the whip and drives God's flock like a cruel taskmaster, laughing at their homelessness, while requiring them to build another ntc church.
We'll see if you have the integrity (As if you, anonymous of questionable character, have room to judge anyone for integrity? This is more manipulative cult language trying to bring about what this pampered anonymous wants--ie do what I say or I will take my ball and go home and say that you have no integrity, whaahhn, whhaahhn cries anonymous like a baby with a full diaper!)
to retract this inaccurate (You mean very ACCURATE true)
true story you have told numerous times (as should be)
on numerous blogs (and the Dispatch Newspaper, in case you missed it.)
It just ain't true. (Oh yes it is.)
You should probably stick to relating your experiences (Try taking your own advice, anonymous. Oh, I guess you don't have any experience. And try thinking before you make such silly suggestions. Reporters make money reporting other people's stories. Happens every day all around the world. It is called REPORTING.)
because those are your own (And you, anonymous, doubtless would try to refute those true stories too; just as you have tried to cover-up this ture story, trying to say its all false. But these are all true - including the Hamptons Homeless true story),
and refrain from invoking the experiences (O00oohhh, more big words, anonymous! Are you trying to impress someone or prove something to yourself?)
of innocents (eXactly true--the hamptons were innocent victims here; who were mercilessly abused and used by r w davis)
who have not asked you (Right! Abuse victims SELDOM DO ask for help; and on the rare occasions when they do, they often change their minds and turn and attack those who came to help them. For example, a woman who is repeatedly beaten by her 'husband' realizes (from past experiences) that THIS is a severe beat-down that may result in death. In a panic she calls the police, hoping they arrive before the fatal blow. However, once the cops arrive, frequently this same victim will turn and attack the police, even physically, trying to defend the one who was beating her down. It is true and a valid example here. No one likes to admit that they have been hurt by those who are supposed to love them. After years of abuse they believe the lies of their abusers and wrongfully blame themselves, believing the abuser's lies such as:
"Look what you made me do!" and
"I'm going to jail because of YOU!"
Nope. You are wrong, abuser. You are going to jail because YOU abused the one who loved you; not because they REPORTED your abuse. That is the same thing here:
NTCC is in trouble because of THEIR ACTIONS, NOT because WE REPORT their actions!
I love when people say X-ers are negative. X-ers are not negative; they simply share what the ntc does. It is what ntc does that is negative. Talking about how ntc treats people shows how negative ntc is.)
innocents that have not asked you to name them publicly in these forums. (It is absolutely necessary to name these innocent victims in these public forums for many reasons:)
- Names prove our credibility by allowing people to verify the truth.
- Names show who is innocent; because other people watch our lives and know who is innocent and who is phony.
- Names eXpose the abusers, warning others to avoid being abused.
- Names are vital / critical to preventing and stopping abuse.
Abusers typically get away with abuse by keeping it a secret. Beaten wives cover their bruises and make excuses for their beaters, "He really didn't mean it." Yes he did. It was not an accident that his fist connected with your face. "He really does love me." No. Charity suffereth long [and] is kind; charity envieth not; charity vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up, Doth not behave itself unseemly, seeketh not her own, is not easily provoked, ... You see, an abuser does not love the victim. But the victim does love the abuser. That is why they suffer long and are kind. You cannot break the scripture. davis' actions prove he does not love the people he abuses like the Hamptons. The scripture backs up what we share here:
But whoso hath this world's good, and seeth his brother have need, and shutteth up his bowels [of compassion] from him, how dwelleth the love of God in him? (1 John 3:17)In obedience to this scriptue we have shared these painful truths with all; for it is written:
My little children, let us not love in word, neither in tongue; but in deed and in truth. (1 John 3:18)
If a man say, I love God, and hateth his brother, he is a liar: for he that loveth not his brother whom he hath seen, how can he love God whom he hath not seen? (1 John 4:20)
And this commandment have we from him, That he who loveth God love his brother also.(1 John 4:21)
Faithful [are] the wounds of a friend; but the kisses of an enemy [are] deceitful. (Prov. 27:6)We have risked wounding you with our true words, ntcc friends, to help you (as any true friend would). In battle a soldier who is wounded may go into shock. Though his arm is ripped off, he will continue fighting, oblivious to his life-threatening wound, focused on the mission. His friends will stop him, even though it means making him painfully aware of his life-threatening injury; they will do so to save his life. Our words may hurt; but our desire is to save our friends' lives by exposing the wounds; so they can receive care and be healed. davis' empty words of "I love you." and "I appreciate you." are just the deceitful kisses of an enemy. Which brings us to a new topic. So ...
We close here. But first we will thank anonymous for once again bringing attention to this vital topic of Hamptons' Homelessness showing the true nature of the false shepherd / hireling r w davis.
"Sunshine" The Happy Cat
