eX-members' of ntcc Blogspot

A safe place for Xers to share their stories and heal.

A place to learn what it's really like in the ntcc founded by Rodger Wilson Davis;
and run by his son-in-law, Michael Craig Kekel,
the father of the one vasectomy-rule-exception kid in ntcc, Grant Davison Kekel.

He Loves A House More Than God: Bonco Mansions of kekel (l) and davis (r)

He Loves A House More Than God:  Bonco Mansions of kekel (l) and davis (r)
"He loves a house more than God:" *Bonco* Mansions of kekel (l) and davis (r). Meanwhile, on the mission field: ntcc Missionaries to the Philippines "Rev. and Sis. Mackert ... found a place, 9 feet by 14 feet [9'x14'] and one bathroom. It is on the 6th floor and there is no elevator. The last place they had stayed, they had to share a common bathroom with the other tenants! Yikes! This place has their very own private bathroom, although the Rev. shared there is no seat on the throne, and no way to attach one…." from The Devonshire Files Sunday, May 28, 2006 Visit from the Mackerts (5/06). ** Should you know where the money ($$$$$) goes? **

Jesus In The Temple

Matt 21:12 And Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves, Matt 21:13 And said unto them, It is written, My house shall be called the house of prayer; but ye have made it a den of thieves.
Gal. 4:16 Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth? John 8:32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free. 1 John 4:6 We are of God: he that knoweth God heareth us; he that is not of God heareth not us. Skip To Blue Letter Bible Search Tool

Podcasts For Desktop Users

Sunday, April 3, 2011

HAMPTON'S HOMELESSNESS REVISITED; butt not retracted!

Recently the Hampton's Homeless Situation has come back into public light. Someone wants this story to disappear and forever go away; because it shows how cruel and thoughtless (and greedy) r w davis is; (yup, rodger w davis the new testament christian churches of America, inc. founder and long time President, now president defacto (which means he says he's retired but he lives in a house valued at $1.1 million dollars that is owned by the so-called "nonprofit" ('splain that' Spanky) ntcc aka new testament christian churches of America, inc., aka "that bunch" up thar in Graham, Wa. with deep roots in St. Louis, Missouri where they called themselves new testament church of God (ntcg) a corporation they have kept on the Missouri State records "just in case" -- i.e. in case someone finally sues them for rampant abuse and they need a back-up borg name so they can fleece new unsuspecting souls who have finally learned the truth about ntcc but don't know ntcg is owned by the same "bunch" as ntcc (imo).

Okay. So ntcc wants the Hampton Homeless story to go away; because everyone knows you don't love God if you don't love people. Folks may not know the scripture 1 Jo 4:19-21 that explains this truth; but they have enough "walkin' around sense" to know that a true "pastor" would NEVER allow ANYONE to go homeless when it is well within his or her means to help. For example, the ntcc, which is a multi-million dollar corporation, has more than enough assets to care for 2 adults and 4 kids laboring for ntcc only 15 miles from the ntcc's empty campground which has hundreds of empty beds. And even if ntcc as a multi-million dollar corporation does not care enough about its own pastors to help Rev. Hampton and his four kids and wife, well, davis, the then-time ntcc president, who is very likely paid ten percent of the corporate assets could well afford to help this family that is working for him and his corporation. Instead davis let the Hampton's remain homeless.

The Hampton's, family of six, four kids and two adults, were left homeless by the hireling rodger w davis while Hampton worked to build a New Testament Christian Church for NTCC in Mexico, Missouri, a town only 15 miles from the NTCC National Campground that has literally hundreds of empty beds. Here is a Bing Aerial View Image of the 80+ acre NTCC National Campground:



And if the corporation NTC was unwilling to dip into its multi-million dollar coffers to help this family laboring for them, davis could have helped by allowing the Hamptons to stay in his huge ski-lodge style vacation home on the ntcc campground, a building named (appropriately) "The Lodge".

"The Lodge" owned by r w and verna and tanya m (michael c kekel) davis / ntcc/g

This is a picture of The Lodge. Notice how huge it is compared to Pop Gaylord (blue shirt) and the other folks standing around in front of it. Upstairs there are six bedrooms with queen size beds and two full bathrooms in the "common area" used for guests. On the end (right side of the photo) upstairs is a private master suite with its own parlor (sitting room), bedroom with king size bed, and full bath. There is also a large balcony for this master suite that runs the width of the building, (accessed from sliding glass doors) and wraps around the front of the building.  The three guest bedrooms on the front side of the Lodge each have their own balconies with sliding glass door access (two appear in the photo)  Downstairs is a huge fireplace in the center of the building, two separate living room areas (his and her style furniture), a huge conference table, a large area used to showcase some of davis' collectibles, and a huge open central area. There is also a half-bath, laundry room, and large kitchen. Why share all this? To show how easily davis could have helped the Hamptons, but instead davis chose to leave this family homelss while they worked building another ntcc church!

"The Lodge" was owned by rodger w and verna and tanya m (kekel) davis until r w davis unloaded the tax burden on ntc, while boasting of retaining full decision-making power as to who does or does not get to stay there -- ensuring a minimum amount of guests in order to get the tax write-off on the property.

Now an anonymous commenter on Jeff's blog wants to try to discredit this true story, demanding a retraction (make it go away). Hmmn. Let's look at anonymous' comment as posted on Jeff's thread aptly titled "Not About Souls":
Ange consider this a rebuttal to your oft repeated and wholly inaccurate Hampton Homeless Story. When Richard Hampton moved to Mexico Mo. he had just sold a property in Graham, and had enough liquidity to purchase a home for cash at auction in Mexico Mo. which he did. The time the Hamptons spent living with the Dicksons enabled them to remodel the home purchased for cash without having to live in the construction dust. This has been confirmed with Anthony Hampton, and yes I also hang out with Phil, David, and even Chrissy several times a year as well as their children. I post anonymously because among the Rakers of Muck you are the nastiest. We'll see if you have the integrity to retract this inaccurate story you have told numerous times on numerous blogs. It just ain't true. You should probably stick to relating your experiences because those are your own, and refrain from invoking the experiences of innocents who have not asked you to name them publicly in these forums. April 01, 2011 8:43 PM
And here it is again with our response woven into it:

Anonymous said,

Ange consider this a rebuttal (note the word BUTT) to your oft repeated (as it should be) and wholly inaccurate (Wrong, anonymous. The story is spot-on accurate, as even someone as blind as you shall see.) Hampton Homeless Story (which should be the focus; but anonymous has another agenda other than the Hamptons being left homeless by a hireling [davis] who poses as their pastor). When Richard Hampton moved to Mexico Mo. he had just sold a property in Graham, (True. Any ntcc member has to sell all he has and move lock-stock-and- barrel at the whim of the commanding general, r w davis; because ntcc won't provide any funds to help someone; and you better do the general's bidding, or get run-off for being "rebellious" or "proud" or "just didn't want God" or for "loving a house more than God" [which really describes davis and kekel more than anyone else we can think of] or any other ntcc catch phrase designed to slander someone without anyone verifying the other side of the story. In fact, this selling of Hampton's home and property may be the real reason davis ordered Hampton to Mexico, MO; since the ntc tried to grab Hampton's property at a low-ball, lower - than - market - rate price; trying to squeeze a brother and rob him!  [And this is backed up by eli gesang's jacking-up Hampton when he refused ntc's selfish low-ball offer made to him while Hampton was trying to give all he has to help build the borg... hmmnn)

[Hampton] had enough liquidity (big word, anon. Most people / members in ntc don't have enough money to even think in terms of 'liquidity'; because everything they have goes into the ntc, making davis and his family (the kekekls) richer off the sacrifice of the people doing the work.)

... to purchase a home for cash (Really? How do you know it was "for cash"?)


at auction in Mexico Mo.  Uhn-hunh...  And tell us, anonymous of the liquidity vocabulary, aren't houses sold at auction MUCH cheaper than most houses?  So not much cash was involved.  And also buying at auction usually requires only a ten-percent down payment in cash while the remainder is often financed.  So often only ten percent is actual cash.


So Hampton probably didn't have much cash to throw around, did he?  No.  How do we know?
  
BECAUSE HAMPTON AND HIS WIFE AND FOUR KIDS WERE HOMELESS!  


OBVIOUSLY NO CASH WAS AVAILABLE!


Meanwhile davis the hireling is all fat and cozy in one of his many houses and the campground sits empty only 15 miles away.

which he did Good for Hampton!  Anyone who labors for umpteen years for God in the ntc deserves to own their own house, especially a guy with four kids who just sold his house and property to go build a work for the borg. And any woman like Diana who has spent decades housing and feeding G.I.s in servicemen's works, moving her sons with her all over the world, sacrificing all they have to help others, that woman ESPECIALLY deserves to have her own house / home where she can take care of her family! 

And isn't this interesting:  

  • How does anonymous know how much 'liquidity' (cash) Hampton had?
  • What business is THAT of the borg or anonymous to know how much cash someone has?
  • What business is THAT how the Hampton's purchased anything???
It should be nobody else's business how much cash or anything else you have!!!! The only time they need to be CONCERNED is if you don't have something that they do have.  Then they should help; as it is commanded in the bible.)

The time the Hamptons spent living with the Dicksons (This "living with the Dicksons" is a euphemism-something said to make something bad look better than it is

The fact is that the Hamptons stayed and slept in Dicksons' GARAGE. We don't consider that "living with the Dicksons" - to be reduced to staying in an old, decrepit, run-down garage like oily rags, while your so-called pastor lives in luxury and leaves you homeless 15 miles away from an empty campground that he has full control over!  Thank God the Dickson's helped in the only way they could.  It was more than davis did for the Hampton family!

The time the hamptons spent living with the Dicksons enabled (Freudian slip for enabling further abuse) 
 them to remodel the home (another euphemism for fixin' up an old house to make it habitable) 
purchased for cash (notice anonymous' fixation on CASH).  Once again, obviously Hamptons' were strapped at this point or they would not have been homeless!
and yes I also hang out with (sounds like another euphemism for being in the same fellowhship hall with them and 200 of your other 'close friends'- ahem-) 
Phil, David, and even Chrissy several times a year as well as their children (Thanks for leaving out the name of the children, who are minors, unlike the Hampton's now adult kids whose names appear in my posts to show credibility). 
I post anonymously because among the Rakers of Muck (another Freudian slip, since mUck is one of many nick-names given to m c kekel who hates to be called mike. Well, mUck, you certainly are getting raked over the hot coals on these blogs; aren't you? But we suppose that is only REAPING considering how much you and your father-in-law davis blast people from the pulpit, plowing their fields for your private benefit / perverse pleasure.) 
you [Ange] are the nastiest. (Ah! Thank you, anonymous. This statement reveals the true nature of why you have posted this reBUTTal: You think I am the "nastiest" of "all the Rakers of Muck". You want to show me something? 
Well, anonymous, you have shown me that I have successfully eXposed some of the ntc's nastiest and dirtiest mUck, such as the true stories that may be found in the comments section for the story found at this link,
  • r w davis guilty of adultery
  • ashmores's son's adultery covered-up by the borg, 
  • davis runs-off mike marshall, and this true story of 
  • davis leaves the Hampton's Homeless despite all their sacrifice and suffering. 

Which brings us to our next point: 

davis never should have ordered the Hamptons to to go do this work. They should have had time to heal. Rich had just lost his wife Penny to the adulterous affair she had with ashmore's son jerry duran, and Diana (marshall) Hampton had just lost her husband mike to davis' infamously and deliberately cruel remark, "If you walk out that door, I'm not coming after you!) Plus her sons Kerry and Carl were grievously hurt by all this, as were Hampton's four children that you have named here. 

The point is that these families needed time to heal from these severe blows. As Mom Gaylord told Diana, "There's only so much one person can take." A real pastor and shepherd would care for his flock and give them time to heal. But davis the hireling breaks out the whip and drives God's flock like a cruel taskmaster, laughing at their homelessness, while requiring them to build another ntc church. 

We'll see if you have the integrity (As if you, anonymous of questionable character, have room to judge anyone for integrity? This is more manipulative cult language trying to bring about what this pampered anonymous wants--ie do what I say or I will take my ball and go home and say that you have no integrity, whaahhn, whhaahhn cries anonymous like a baby with a full diaper!) 

to retract this inaccurate (You mean very ACCURATE true)
true story you have told numerous times (as should be) 
on numerous blogs (and the Dispatch Newspaper, in case you missed it.) 
It just ain't true. (Oh yes it is.) 
You should probably stick to relating your experiences (Try taking your own advice, anonymous. Oh, I guess you don't have any experience.  And try thinking before you make such silly suggestions.  Reporters make money reporting other people's stories.  Happens every day all around the world.  It is called REPORTING.) 
because those are your own (And you, anonymous, doubtless would try to refute those true stories too; just as you have tried to cover-up this ture story, trying to say its all false.  But these are all true - including the Hamptons Homeless true story), 
and refrain from invoking the experiences (O00oohhh, more big words, anonymous!  Are you trying to impress someone or prove something to yourself?)
of innocents (eXactly true--the hamptons were innocent victims here; who were mercilessly abused and used by r w davis) 
who have not asked you (Right! Abuse victims SELDOM DO ask for help; and on the rare occasions when they do, they often change their minds and turn and attack those who came to help them. For example, a woman who is repeatedly beaten by her 'husband' realizes (from past experiences) that THIS is a severe beat-down that may result in death. In a panic she calls the police, hoping they arrive before the fatal blow. However, once the cops arrive, frequently this same victim will turn and attack the police, even physically, trying to defend the one who was beating her down. It is true and a valid example here. No one likes to admit that they have been hurt by those who are supposed to love them. After years of abuse they believe the lies of their abusers and wrongfully blame themselves, believing the abuser's lies such as: 

"Look what you made me do!" and 
"I'm going to jail because of YOU!"
Nope. You are wrong, abuser. You are going to jail because YOU abused the one who loved you; not because they REPORTED your abuse. That is the same thing here: 

NTCC is in trouble because of THEIR ACTIONS, NOT because WE REPORT their actions! 

I love when people say X-ers are negative. X-ers are not negative; they simply share what the ntc does. It is what ntc does that is negative. Talking about how ntc treats people shows how negative ntc is.)

innocents that have not asked you to name them publicly in these forums. (It is absolutely necessary to name these innocent victims in these public forums for many reasons:)
  1. Names prove our credibility by allowing people to verify the truth.
  2. Names show who is innocent; because other people watch our lives and know who is innocent and who is phony.
  3. Names eXpose the abusers, warning others to avoid being abused. 
  4. Names are vital / critical to preventing and stopping abuse. 
Abusers typically get away with abuse by keeping it a secret. Beaten wives cover their bruises and make excuses for their beaters, "He really didn't mean it." Yes he did. It was not an accident that his fist connected with your face. "He really does love me." No. Charity suffereth long [and] is kind; charity envieth not; charity vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up, Doth not behave itself unseemly, seeketh not her own, is not easily provoked, ... You see, an abuser does not love the victim. But the victim does love the abuser. That is why they suffer long and are kind. You cannot break the scripture. davis' actions prove he does not love the people he abuses like the Hamptons. The scripture backs up what we share here:
But whoso hath this world's good, and seeth his brother have need, and shutteth up his bowels [of compassion] from him, how dwelleth the love of God in him?  (1 John 3:17)
My little children, let us not love in word, neither in tongue; but in deed and in truth. (1 John 3:18)
If a man say, I love God, and hateth his brother, he is a liar: for he that loveth not his brother whom he hath seen, how can he love God whom he hath not seen?  (1 John 4:20)
And this commandment have we from him, That he who loveth God love his brother also.(1 John 4:21)
In obedience to this scriptue we have shared these painful truths with all; for it is written:
Faithful [are] the wounds of a friend; but the kisses of an enemy [are] deceitful.  (Prov. 27:6)
We have risked wounding you with our true words, ntcc friends,  to help you (as any true friend would). In battle a soldier who is wounded may go into shock. Though his arm is ripped off, he will continue fighting, oblivious to his life-threatening wound, focused on the mission. His friends will stop him, even though it means making him painfully aware of his life-threatening injury; they will do so to save his life. Our words may hurt; but our desire is to save our friends' lives by exposing the wounds; so they can receive care and be healed. davis' empty words of "I love you." and "I appreciate you." are just the deceitful kisses of an enemy.  Which brings us to a new topic. So ...

We close here. But first we will thank anonymous for once again bringing attention to this vital topic of Hamptons' Homelessness showing the true nature of the false shepherd / hireling r w davis.

 "Sunshine" The Happy Cat 

12 comments:

1 NCO 2 Another said...

I find it very interesting how this anonymous poster assumes that everyone should believe him just because he "verified" his version of events with the Hamptons.

My wife was there at the campground and witnessed these events first hand. I'm sure that the Hamptons being members of a controlling organization and still afraid of their abusers, are going to downplay the events so they don't receive any more beatings (they do not wish to become pulpit fodder) for what they went through years ago.

It would also be interesting to know why this anonymous poster would expect a retraction and arrogantly assume that his lack of knowledge would trump this true story of events that took place.

Why is it that when somebody in the borg falsely accuses X-ers of wrong doing and then gets caught spewing out lies, nobody in that abusive organization demands a retraction? Anonymous, did you demand a retraction from your highly esteemed borg leader mUck when he falsely accused Casey Hayes?

One more very hypocritical thing that I'd love you to expound upon, anonymous. I would really like to know the true reason why you don't want your true identity to be known? Why would we rake your name through the Muck if you haven't done anything wrong? Is it possible that you are just as scared and guilty of abuse as others that post anonymously on these blogs? When you have nothing to hide, you don't need to wrap yourself in a cloak of secrecy. I know my name gets drug through the Muck by many in the ntcc; but that doesn't stop me from using my true identity. You see, anonymous, I believe in what I stand for and am not ashamed of who I am.

I understand why X-ers post anonymously. They have been taught all their life that if they disagree or leave they will die and go to hell. I have a hard time with people that openly rebuke others in public but are worried about what might be said about them by the people they hate. Every pastor I had thought that they were right and the world was wrong. How many times have I heard an ntcc pastor say, "I don't care what anyone says or thinks about me, I'm going to preach against your sin anyway" as they preach hell and damnation to anyone that disagrees with them.

Keep up the good work Ange. If it's true post it. It will help somebody that's struggling with the abusive ways of the destructive ntcc cult that we are here to eXpose.

Don

Ange said...

Thanks for the encouragement, Don. With God's help and by His grace I plan on continuing eXposing the truth about ntcc/ntcg.
I had to laugh at how anonymous said he "verified" with Anthony Hampton (Tony). It reminded me of kekel's weasel words - "we didn't go there" about his pre-marital groping of tanya davis when she was a minor. Weasel words are vague statements designed to deceive. As previously pointed out by Vic Johanson on another blog. Weasel words are what the bible calls "making a lie". I imagine anonymous calling Tony Hampton and demanding: "Did your father pay cash at an auction when he bought that house in Mexico?" And a bewildered Tony says, "Yes." -click- end of call; then anonymous makes a sweeping weasel-word statement about "verifying" blah, blah, blah. I'm not impressed with this nonsense. davis is guilty of letting this family of six suffer needlessly. That is the bottom line here. "Anyone who can't see that is as blind as a bat!"- as Jeff likes to say!
I say to anonymous next time you want to bristle like a thistle, trying to defend the indefensible, ask yourself one simple question: Would Jesus do this thing I am about to defend? If the answer is "No." don't try to defend it. Anon wants to bend his tongue but is not valiant for the Truth. Jesus is the Truth. If He would not do this thing or approve of it, neither should you.

Ange

Anonymous said...

1 NCO 2 Another said...
"You see, anonymous, I believe in what I stand for and am not ashamed of who I am."

Why have an anonymous button if you are going harass people for using it?

Don and Ange said...

Anonymous said,

"Why have an anonymous button if you are going harass people for using it?"

Don and Ange said,

I only harass the sanctimonious pharisees, for using the anonymous button. I guess I shouldn't because hypocrites can get saved too, but I feel that the majority of ntcc ministers and old timers shouldn't get a pass. The anonymous poster that triggered this thread was calling Ange "Nasty" but didn't have the courage to put his or her name on their accusatory statements. It doesn't get any more hypocritical than this.

We enabled the Anonymous comment feature on this blog because many people leave the ntcc in fear for their lives. Why do they leave in fear? Because it is instilled in them that if they leave the ntcc the following things will happen to them:

1. God will forsake them.

2. They will die and go to hell.

3. Their life will crumble to pieces.

4. God will not bless them.

When they leave the ntcc, they name is drug through the gutter and they are used as an admonishment to others of how wicked and evil they are for leaving God's last move on earth. Many that leave go into sin because they think there is no hope outside of the ntcc. Others leave determined to find God in another church but have to overcome years of false teaching and brainwashing to allow themselves to realize that God is everywhere and that the ntcc is the last place on earth a person should go that wants God.

Finally, the great thing about being out of the ntcc is that we don't have to put up with wining, sniveling borg leaders that tell us what we should and shouldn't do. We live according to the dictates of the God's word and follow the convictions of His Spirit. It's very easy to distinguish the difference between someone who is sincere and someone who still believes they should follow the ntcc leaders into darkness without thinking for themselves.

We encourage the shipwrecked, tortured and abused souls that have departed or are thinking of departing to use the "anonymous button" and learn the truth about the destructive cult they desire to leave. Learn from others that have departed that God still is God and He still forgives and shows mercy to those that call on His name. To those that want to find fault and do lip service to God, you too can continue to use the "anonymous button" but we reserve the right to call you out as you have publicly used the pulpit to blast people into eternity with no hesitation of calling them out. We hope this answers your question about the "anonymous button".

Anonymous said...

It is what it is. And you can't change that.

Anonymous said...

Looks like anonymous had his reBUTTal handed to him %-o

Don and Ange said...

Thanks to the anonymous poster on Jeff's blog that left info about the Wikipedia definition of

muckraker

which includes these main points:

A muckraker is, primarily, a writer who investigates and publishes truthful reports involving a host of social issues, broadly including crime and corruption and often involving elected officials, political leaders and influential members of business and industry. [...]To which we add: organizations. [...]

more Wiki definition:
In a number of instances, the revelations of muckraking journalists led to public outcry, governmental and legal investigations,

and, in some cases, legislation was enacted to address the issues the writers' identified, such as harmful social conditions;
pollution; food and product safety standards; sexual harassment; unfair labor practices; fraud; and other matters. To which we add:Abuse of office, spiritual abuse, verbal abuse, physical abuse, sexual abuse and manipulation by persons in positions of trust!

more Wiki definition:
The work of the muckrakers in the early years, and those today, span a wide array of legal, social, ethical and public policy concerns. [...]
More Wiki definition at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muckraker

Don and Ange say,

There could not be a more noble title bestowed on us as we pursue the truth of the misdeeds and abuse rampant in the abusive and destructive cult called ntcc / ntcg.

We are the Xers. We are raking up your muck, ntcc; and by God's grace we will continue to do so.

Thanks to both the petulant name-calling anonymous and the astute erudite anonymous who provided us with this discussion on MUCKRAKERS.


Don and Ange
The mUckRakers

Don and Ange said...

Anonymous said, "It is what it is. And you can't change that." Mon Apr 04, 10:45:00 PM

The mUckRakers say,

Hey, Anon. We are just curious where you are coming from. What is your point? We'd like to respond to your comment. But could you please give us more to work with? As it stands now your comment could be interpreted too many different ways.

Thanks

The mUckRakers

Don and Ange said...

Anonymous said, "Looks like anonymous had his reBUTTal handed to him %-o"
Wed Apr 06, 03:57:00 PM

The mUckRakers say,

PRICELESS!

anthony said...

(I'm sure that the Hamptons being members of a controlling organization and still afraid of their abusers, are going to downplay the events so they don't receive any more beatings (they do not wish to become pulpit fodder) for what they went through years ago.) Your wife witnessed first hand then why is she not writing this.

(I imagine anonymous calling Tony Hampton and demanding: "Did your father pay cash at an auction when he bought that house in Mexico?" And a bewildered Tony says, "Yes." -click- end of call;) Why becauce you are to scared top ask my dad what really happen.

what happen in the past we cant change so why dwell on the past. He who has no sin let him cast the first stone. Do i think about what happen to me as a kid yes but can i change no. Do i wish thing could of been diferent yes but they were not. Ange you want to call me look me up you seem t have all the info about are family call me.
Anthony Hampton (Tony) is what my frends call me.
Pastor Davis Rev. Kekel Rev. Olson Rev Johnon and so on are my family Love You All
No i am not a member of the church and have not been for a while but i will never by the grace of God talk bad about the Men Of God.

Ange said...

Dear Tony,

First of all, I want to thank you for responding to this story. I think it is terrible what your family went through during this time in your lives. I really pray that God will use it for His good purposes. I enjoyed learning from the anonymous poster(s) on Jeff's blog that you are "on fire for God". It really made me smile and glad in my soul for you and your family.

I'm sorry if this story is uncomfortable for you. But I feel it is very important for people in and out of ntcc to know the truth about the way rodger w davis runs the ntcc.

Your mother, Diana, is a wonderful person, whom I admire and love. I find it very distressing to this day that davis could do to her and your family what he did by leaving you to live out of an old garage. It seems you have read the article and comments, so you know what I mean.

Here is this precious family, the Hamptons, that is just getting to know each other; they've given everything they have up to build a work for God; but how does davis 'help'? He goes around behind your Dad's back saying, "He'll never build a work for God."

davis, if he loved your family as he says with his mouth, but not with his actions, could have opened up the Lodge and let you stay there. Simple. If davis was too greedy to do that, he still could have let you stay in the many empty buildings on the campground.

Instead davis chose not to do anything to help. Instead he chose to not go to the church your family was running when he visited the campground. And while davis did that, the workers at the camp stayed away too. They wanted to follow davis' example.

What sin did your family commit that would warrant being shunned or disfellowshipped? None.

The bible says we are not to love with only words. It says we are to love with deeds. davis can tell you and your parents he 'loves you' and 'appreciates' you. But that is just cheap talk. davis' actions prove that he does not love you.

Let's look at this another way:

Could you let davis' stay in old garage with four kids and a new wife if the roles were reversed? No. I didn't think so. You would help them.

But davis did not help your family. And it really would not have even been any sacrifice for davis to help. But davis still did not help your family.

Jesus said the good shepherd gives his life for the sheep. But a hireling flees. davis ran away from helping your family. He completely avoided them just like a hireling. All davis would have had to do was say,

"Hey, why don't you stay at the Lodge until your house is ready?"

Ange

Ange said...

Hey Tony,

"Ange you want to call me look me up ..."

Would you please e-mail me your phone number? My e-mail is 1gi2another@gmail.com

Thanks,

Ange

P.S.

I'd like to hear your side of things and answer your questions too.

Tour NTCC Videos -- A Playlist

HOPCC EXPOSED Ron Denis' "House of Prayer" AKA "Denis' Den of Thieves"

HOPCC EXPOSED Ron Denis' "House of Prayer" AKA "Denis' Den of Thieves"
HOPCC / [Assembly of Prayer] Exploitation Exposed Click Picture To Learn More

Recent Posts

_______________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________